SolomonSuccess.com

New FHA Rules Mean Higher Mortgage Costs

SS4-30-13King Solomon advocated prudence in all things – a combination of knowledge and careful thinking that leads to prosperity and a life blessed by God. “To know wisdom, and instruction; to understand the words of prudence,” he says in the first two verses of the Book of Proverbs. With reports of new FHA home financing policy changes coming in June 2013, words of prudence for home owners and investors might be: finance or refinance now.

After the housing collapse of 2008 that resulted in record numbers of foreclosures and homeowners in danger of foreclosure, a number of mortgage assistance programs were created and offered by both mortgage lenders and government housing agencies such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and backed by the FHA, which was responsible for funding bailout programs like HARP (Homeowner Affordable Refinance Program).

But now, the FHA’s Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund, its primary source for supporting mortgage assistance programs, is running at a severe deficit –over $16 billion for the fiscal year 2013. Because the FHA must maintain a federally mandated reserve of funds, this means that costs to program applicants must rise – with a ripple effect across the housing market as a whole.

According to the newsletter of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, June 3, 2013 is the date set for implementing the new belt-tightening rules affecting both mortgage insurance and interest rates on some government backed financing and refinancing arrangements. New rules on mortgage insurance tie payments to tighter standards for down payments on mortgages. Under the new regulations, both investors and residential homebuyers who can put down over 10 percent of the loan amount up front will end up paying mortgage insurance only for the first 11 years of the loan. But although applicants who can’t come up with a down payment of this size can still qualify for the loan, they can expect to pay mortgage insurance payments for the entire life of the loan.

For large mortgages or refinances in loan amounts over $650,000, the required down payment – or, in the case of refinances, the amount of equity in the home – will increase. Currently set at 3.5 percent of the home’s total value, this amount rises to 5 percent after June 3. This change is likely to affect owners of large residential homes and investors purchasing or owning multiplexes.

Add these FHA rule changes to predictions that mortgage interest rates across the board are expected to rise – reaching an estimated 4.9 percent by the end of 2013 – and there’s a pretty good argument for acting now to start the mortgage process, or to apply for refinancing help through private lenders or any of the homeowner assistance programs funded by the FHA or related agencies.

A key piece of Jason Hartman’s investing philosophy is to keep mortgage debt and refinance whenever possible. For investors seeking to build wealth through income property, the FHA’s new rules could take a bigger bite.  (Top image: Flickr/Flikkesteph)

The Solomon Success Team

solomonsuccess logo

Related Posts

Inside Real Estate Arbitrage

The Solomon Success ShowThe principal “arbitrage” opportunity in real estate is realized by locking in a fixed cost of borrowing (which can be re-financed in the future if interest rates drop) and generating cash flow to cover your costs. In this situation, you have a very limited downside risk because of recurring cash flows, but a tremendous opportunity for leveraged appreciation from market growth and inflation.

Read More »

S&P 500 vs. Gold Price

SolomonSuccess.comOne of the important ratios to keep in mind when examining the equity markets is the gold price relative to the major stock market indexes. This provides a valuable insight into the extent to which market values reflect a real shift of sentiment toward equity value, versus the extent to which the value has lost value, driving increases in nominal valuations to simply retain purchasing power. Over the last 35 years, the relative price of Gold1 and the S&P 5002 has oscillated up and down very significantly. In the aftermath of 2008 and the financial crisis, this ratio has regressed toward a value of 1.0, which indicates equal valuation for the S&P 500 index and an ounce of gold. In the latter half of 2010, the S&P 500 vs. Gold ratio dropped below 1.0 as Gold prices were pushed up by speculators seeking to hedge against expected future inflation. Our analysis indicates that this trend is likely to continue through 2011 as monetary expansion inflates both asset classes.

Read More »
×

Loading chat...